-> ,validPeriod= 1 -> The vast majority of experts and politicians in the US, regardless of party affiliation also believes that the billionaire seeking the Republican nomination for the presidential election is simply no coherent vision of foreign affairs, and his statements on this matter are contradictory. On Wednesday, Trump gave Washington his first speech devoted exclusively to foreign policy. As noted commentator on CNBC, "it was very long, Trump said virtually nothing, yet it was so chaotic, though service teleprompter mistook the order of pages." "Trump does not have in this respect no experience. If he went to the White House, the reality would force him to verify a number of ideas" - says Laqueur. The candidate said in his half-hour speech to strengthen the armed forces, basing foreign policy on "American interests" and alleviate current tensions between Washington and the Kremlin. He also promised to create a team advisers. Foreign consisting of "new people". Probably because only such people would be willing to take it. Nearly one hundred Republican experts on security, diplomacy and "veterans of US foreign policy" signed in early March letter, in which distance themselves from the controversial billionaire. "The statements of Mr. Trump himself led us to the conclusion that as president (...) would make America less safe and downplayed its position in the world" - says the letter, quoted by Reuters news agency. The authors promised to "take vigorous action, aiming to prevent that someone so wrong was elected president." Also they criticized his sympathy for authoritarian leaders - above all, Vladimir Putin. Europeans are concerned in the statements of Trump that he sees no need to "unconditionally guarantee the safety of America's allies," - writes "Le Figaro". Prof. Longin Pastusiak - political scientist and Americanist - explained in an interview with PAP that "Trump considers NATO as the structure of the anachronistic and criticizes allies for lack of contribution to the defense of the West. His views are dangerous to us for this reason that pushes on isolationism and wants to withdraw obligations ( USA) to defend NATO allies, "- he said. Above all, Trump "manifests a fascination with power and dictators" - writes "Le Figaro". He announced that "would have a great relationship with Putin." The conservative French weekly "Le Point" notes that "since there is American diplomacy, not planned yet so radical change of alliances, such as that advocated by Republican candidate." It takes the view that Americans should stop "disturb Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinpingowi (President of China) and Kim Jong Unowi (North Korean leader)." "La Croix", French daily Catholic, draws attention to another idea Trump: "The businessman believes that NATO is outdated and should be replaced by an organization that would focus on the fight against terrorism" - reports the newspaper. "Washington Post" writes that the candidate believes that "European conflicts are not worth American lives." "The withdrawal from Europe would save us millions of dollars a year" - says Trump. The French magazine "L'Obs" writes that if the billionaire wins the election, the "world order will be overturned - and change for the worse." The American think-tank Stratfor estimates that Trump represents a "caricature of a political realist." "Friendships that America has built over the last 70 years are worth much more than their weight in gold, and little is able to as quickly jeopardize US security as the rupture of those alliances" - says Stratfor, calling the ideas Trump's foreign policy " transactional thinking. " "The values and calculation are not alternative approaches to foreign policy; they are always inseparable" - heavy warfare Stratfor. The American portal dealing with the analysis of the political programs of candidates' OnTheIssues "gathered up the main arguments and statements that are to be submitted to the International Programme Trump. About Ukraine - its problems should be addressed to deal with neighboring countries, especially Germany, not America; "We can not constantly be the policeman of the world". About Syria - Syrian conflict should be addressed Russia, as well as the Islamic State (IS). "Putin has to take care of him, because he does not want to IS reached Russia" - argues billionaire. About Putin - Trump says that thanks to its agreement with Putin, who is "very popular politician" sytuajca the world will be "much more stable." Middle East - billionaire wants to withdraw from the nuclear agreement with Iran and establish closer cooperation with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. China - are real and most important enemy of the United States; Trump is so going to fight with Beijing economic means, "but does not rule out military intervention." All of this seems to terrify Europe much more than America. It is also unclear to worry about really. One day extravagant candidate shy away from any military intervention, another - promises to bombard IS, wipe up the organization of the Earth's surface. Sometimes it is going to "get along" with Kim Jong Unem, another time proposes that "took him" The Chinese. "Der Spiegel" so called Trump's most dangerous man in the world, the BBC writes that the Republican candidate "draws the international condemnation." The British "Economist" wrote Trump: "It is so unpredictable, that the thought of that could be found anywhere near the high office is appalling." "awaits us dangerous time" - said Prof. PAP. Zbigniew Lewicki the Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw. "If Trump becomes president, I do not think that was effective in foreign policy. The most dangerous is his fascination with Putin. (...) Putin wrapped it around her finger." Marta Fita-Czuchnowska Subscribe to digital Electoral available through the internet, phone, tablet and eReader from 19.90 per month
Why so much look for?
"Assuming he even have a foreign policy, it can be concluded that if you become president, it is guided by a belief that is not should be involved in the problems of other countries, "- predicts Laqueur, a renowned American historian and expert. security and terrorism.
No comments:
Post a Comment