Political scientists are of the opinion that the occurrence of Beata Szydlo before the European Parliament was successful.
The European Parliament held a debate on the situation in Poland. She was a result of the controversy, which sparked enacted in haste change in the Constitutional Court and the public media.
– The level of general discussion was surprising – as a political scientist from Warsaw, Jacek Oleksiejuk Lazarski assesses the debate. In his view, like we were not surprised, as compared to other speeches, Law and Justice deputy prime minister won.
The expert draws attention to the thoughtful design features of speech, Prime Minister Beata Awl. Notes that it could not attack because Poland does not want to leave the European Union.
According to Jack Oleksiejuk, the Prime Minister drew attention to the fact that liberal democracy is not the only form of democracy.
“The debate did not change the situation”
– The debate in the European Parliament will not change the international situation Polish, it remains difficult – said the President of the Batory Foundation Aleksander Smolar.
Smolar estimated that during the debate at the Prime Minister Awl almost did not die as specific charges, and the whole discussion remains at a very general level, and had a moderate tone. It filled mainly declarations, among others, solidarity with Polish or affirmation of values, which, according to favor threaten the moves of the Polish government.
EBS / x-news
– It was not an event that in any way change the international situation Polish. It seems to me that the international situation Polish remains difficult – rated Smolar.
He added that all sides in the EP was the will, so the word they gave on Monday the president Andrzej Duda and the head of the European Council, Donald Tusk, to calm down the atmosphere and do not dramatize, although strongly critical of statements by politicians PO PiS just before the debate.
When asked about the occurrence of the head of Polish government said that from a technical point of view, it was successful. – Mrs. Prime Minister emerged from this test, although often spoke a language that too much like propaganda pre-election if present, spoke of a good change, she used phrases – said the president of the Stefan Batory Foundation.
“The Prime Minister on the dial “
– Debate in the European will have great significance for internal policy in Poland, but will tailwind for the PiS government, the more that the president Andrzej Duda was in Brussels – are two solid, good squalls in the sails for the president and prime minister. Do not exaggerate, however, that it will appoint a new course or a strengthened government camp, because there is however a lot of question marks “- rated Jacek Regina-Zacharski from the University of Lodz.
According to the expert, will be crucial decision, or at the next session of Parliament in early February will be adopted Resolution on Polish. – The voices on this issue are divided, as some MEPs say that if you receive such a request is sick, the other that well – noted Regina-Zacharski.
– The debate did not bring much new, it was not about that to anyone convince. Premier Law and Justice deputy was quite right in saying that there was, in principle, to the substantive questions about the issues of the Constitutional Court if the public media – said Regina-Zacharski .
“Each in his own mind”
– Prime Minister well presented in the European Parliament during the debate about Poland, but everyone still remained at his sentence – said the expert of the Brussels think tank Centre Martens Roland Freudenstein, commenting on the debate in Strasbourg.
– The very debate about Polish Parliament was justified. And in this case the argument Prime Minister showed up a contradiction. On the one hand, he assured that would be happy to discuss with the EP and is ready to answer any questions, but on the other hand, several times repeated that the debate should not take place – said the expert.
Is Poland threaten penalties?
– Generally speaking, the Prime Minister Awl presented herself well, she said sensibly. Maybe the problem was that she got applause and a lot of support very radical right-wing MEPs who are opposed to the European Union. I think of them, the Prime Minister could be more to distance, he did not do – he said Freudenstein.
What was missing?
According to Renata Mieńkowskiej-Norkiene with University of Warsaw, the first instance of Beata Szydlo was “little general”. – Perhaps to a greater extent, the prime minister, instead of referring to issues such as the dignity of the Poles and the desire to be respected in the international arena, should refer specifically to the allegations of these two laws, which are the most controversial – says Renata Mieńkowska-Norkiene.
He adds that the Prime Minister Awl should have to raise more fundamental questions concerning why government decisions do not violate the rule of law.
According to ekspertki, Prime Minister Awl should also have to indicate in which areas the government and parliament show good will to communicate with the opposition and what it can offer to the opposition to a greater extent engaged in activities for the good of changes in the country.
IAR, PAP, bk
No comments:
Post a Comment