Italy: up To 15 increased the death toll from an avalanche on the hotel – Virtual Russia

The British Parliament must vote on the notice of withdrawal from the EU. This was decided by the highest British court on Tuesday in London, and came to the government in the way. The eleven judges of the Supreme Court confirmed in the appeal an earlier judgment of the High Court from November 2016.

even then, the group had won the Fund Manager Gina Miller. She stressed, however, always, not the Referendum tilt, but only a vote in Parliament. Also, according to the judgment of the Supreme Court, they said it was gone only to “legal issues”. The planned exit from the EU is already shaking. The presiding judge Neuberger made it clear once again: The Referendum of 23. June 2016 is provided by the judgment in question. The government is afraid of but two things:

government wants to bring “everything Necessary” to do

the voice of the Parliament could be an already tight time schedule for the negotiations with the European Union in a mess – actually, it will launch formally by the end of March, the withdrawal from the EU. On the other, it is possible that the MPs water down the planned Brexit and for a stronger EU could demand close to.

More about

In the British Parliament there are a number of EU-friendly votes, especially with regard to the membership in the internal market. Theresa May on the other hand, for a “hard Brexit”. You want to leave the EU-the internal market, and immigration, more stringent regulate and the UK to escape the Jurisdiction of the European court of justice.

According to disappointed the government has shown after the announcement of the judgment. You will but, nevertheless, do “everything Necessary” to the judgment to implement, said attorney General Jeremy Wright, who represented the government in the process.

Scotland don’t get a say

“Within days” to be submitted to the Parliament a law proposal, said Brexit-Minister David Davis on Tuesday afternoon. The design should be kept simple. Also on her schedule for the Brexit want to hold on to the government. The exit statement will be sent, as planned, at the end of March to Brussels, so Davis. From Brussels there was no comment on the judgment of the Supreme Court. You do not wait for the termination request and review internal law of States.

the government must obtain in the case of Brexit Parliament vote

head of the Labour party, Jeremy Corbyn, however, the judgment welcomed. Via Twitter, the opposition politicians informed the government had been forced, the sovereignty of the Parliament to acknowledge. At the same time, he made it clear once again that the Labour party would not put the Referendum out of the question. But they wanted to prevent that, the government is transformed in the course of the EU-leaving the UK in a tax Paradise for companies. Theresa May has had flirts in the past, repeatedly, with the idea to lower corporate taxes in the UK.

The judgment, however, could yet have far-reaching consequences for Mays Brexit plans. And, if the judge is also Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland would have a say. Just the Scots want to be careful to stay in the EU internal market.

This right, the court denied, however, the decision is solely at the British Parliament. Scotland’s head of government Sturgeon responded angrily: The agreements on the rights of the regions had proved to be worthless, Sturgeon. The government in London was politically obliged to consult the parliaments of the regions. At the same time they threatened again with a new Referendum about Scottish independence: It’ll more and more clear that Scotland must take control of its future “into their own hands”.

Two years of time for negotiations

Possible delays to the Brexit are not meanwhile to be underestimated: According to article 50 of the EU Treaty, the negotiations on the withdrawal must be completed two years after the submission of the application. Also, the EU and chief negotiator, Michel Barnier is keen to be able to as soon as possible with concrete negotiations to begin.

After the two-year bargaining period without agreement, namely, the unregulated withdrawal of Britain. Because neither side is interested. The interdependence of the economy and too important to have a coordinated approach in combating terrorism or climate policy. As May said in her speech to the Brexit, London will continue to be a reliable Partner, ally and close friend of the EU. There are, however, some clear and first of all, a clean separation has to be performed.

May want a clean break with the EU