The European Commission has not officially confirmed information about the financial penalties for countries that do not adopt the refugees. According to Saturday’s reports Italian newspaper “La Stampa”, Brussels wants refused entry per person, the state paid 250,000 euros.
The European Commission confirmed only that the day after tomorrow will announce plans to reform the rules on the reception. – Actually, you can expect the proposal on Wednesday, but about what she will decide the European Commission at its meeting – said her spokeswoman Mina Andreew.
Obama: accept 10,000 refugees from Syria
Does this proposal will be financial penalties, and whether it will be a quarter of a million euros for each unmatched refugee ?
These representatives of the European Commission did not specify.
the fact is that in the autumn of last year there were similar ideas. The Commission suggested that in exceptional circumstances, EU countries could buy the obligation to accept asylum seekers – governments would pay an appropriate sum to the EU budget.
But then those ideas identified as odd and was not for them acceptance among Member States.
What are the Commission’s proposals?
According to unofficial information, the reform has assumed, among others, putting in a crisis situation, a permanent system of distribution of refugees between the EU countries.
As said on Monday, a spokeswoman for the European Commission Mina Andreew, the Commission proposal will be based on two options that have been suggested on April 6, and then discussed by the Ministers of the Interior EU countries. The aim of the announced reform is a fairer distribution of the burden among the EU countries in case of a large influx of migrants.
Officials of the Commission stipulate that the work on the final version of the proposal is still in progress. According to unofficial information, the European Commission will decide on a less radical option, which is the correction of the Dublin Regulation. According to this Regulation is currently responsible for examining applications for asylum rests with the country where the refugees crossed the border of the EU.
According to the idea of EC rules have been supplemented by the Dublin correction mechanism. In the case of a large influx of refugees, above the threshold, the system was run by their relocation to other EU countries. Distribution of refugees would take place on the basis of objective criteria such as the size of the GDP, population or the number of already adopted asylum seekers.
The second, more radical option asylum reform, which suggested in April, the European Commission, assumed the distribution of refugees between the EU countries according to a fixed distribution key and objective criteria such as the population, the level of gross national income, experience in the reception of refugees or family ties connecting migrants with the country of the EU. In this system would not matter in which country a refugee first submit an application for asylum.
According to EU diplomats preliminary discussion with the governments of the Member States showed that the farther reaching reform would not have much chance to the party.
April 21 after the meeting of interior ministers of the EU in Luxembourg, Poland has decided against both proposed by the European Commission variants of the reform of EU asylum policy. “We oppose both the one and the other option, because both contain a permanent mechanism for relocation (refugees),” – he said the head of the Interior Ministry Law and Justice deputy.
– The Polish position is consistent and clear. We believe that a permanent system relocation (refugees) is a poor mechanism that attracts waves of refugees, and not solve the problem with which Europe has to do – he added Błaszczak.
IAR / PAP / agkm
Video March 2016. the Russian intervention in Syria has increased influx of refugees to Europe, and the absence of western intervention deepened the crisis in the Middle East, because the next president of the United Zjednocznych and European leaders should end up with a policy of non-interference in the region – says analyst Daniel Twining (German Marshall Fund)
No comments:
Post a Comment