Lawyers Ms. Rousseff brought this appeal, both because of the “serious procedural shortcomings”, which – in their opinion – has committed a Senate procedowaniu against Dilmie Rousseff, and the fact that it did not commit any criminal offense, as stated in his verdict we senators.
the charges against Rousseff was based on two articles of the Act of 1950, which provide the basis for depriving the President of his mandate may be a criminal offense involving “vires.”
for a majority of the Senate considered a violation of the budget law by falling in three cases without prior parliamentary approval for additional, relatively small loans of public banks under the control of the president. Dilma Rousseff made this decision mainly in order to save government social programs threatened by the economic crisis.
Goods Act before 66 years – say in the appeal lawyers Rousseff – “are incompatible with the Constitution of Brazil 1988″, which according to them “not to include the full legal text known as the law on impeachmencie.”
the defenders Ms. Rousseff request the Supreme Court that in this case said. They submitted an application to the referee Teori Zavasckiego, which has the authority to decide whether to submit it to the plenary of the Supreme Court, whose president Ricardo Lewandowski chaired the hearing, the final stage of the proceedings against Rousseff.
senior adviser to President Michel Temer, Brazilian political scientist Thiago Aragao, said on the day of the verdict of the Senate, that now the task of the successor of Mrs. Rousseff will make up for several years, during which it was implemented the policy of the Brazilian Workers Party, and rapid privatization. Although the first steps made in this direction the government Ms. Rousseff, but now – says Aragao – this should be a very accelerated.
The first to go – according to him – railways, airports, ports, telecommunications market, oil and giant newly discovered oil fields in the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean.
the great Spanish daily “El Pais” wrote Thursday in its Brazilian edition of “Temer, former professor of constitutional law stripped more charisma, which for half of the mandate of Ms Rousseff was her deputy (…) will have to fight hard as a politician enjoying very low popularity. “
Journal adds that after several years of center-left governments of its social reforms he has little time to carry out” unpopular moves ” because his mandate ends in 2018.
“What’s more – emphasizes the” El Pais “- he is threatened during a large police operation on the corruption scandal surrounding the Brazilian oil company Petrobras, which” could harm members of his government. “
” Sam Temer – adds “El Pais” – was mentioned by some people involved in the affair: argue that the use of illicit funds during his election campaign. “
Although this, like the “Folha de Sao Paulo”, representing the opinion of the most influential Brazilian financial circles, the vast majority of Brazilian media believes that Wednesday’s verdict of the Senate is the definitive end of thirteen-year rule of the left represented by the Workers’ Party charismatic president (2003-2011) Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
No comments:
Post a Comment